2003 WI App 91 - State v. Triggs’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
6 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Frazier v. Cupp · State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. Burke · 117 Wis. 2d 701 - State v. Woods · United States v. Velasquez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Inflating evidence of [the defendant's] guilt interfered little, if at all, with his "free and deliberate choice" of whether to confess, for it did not lead him to consider anything beyond his own beliefs regarding his actual guilt or innocence, his moral sense of right and wrong, and his judgment regarding the likelihood that the police had garnered enough valid evidence linking him to the crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[L]ies told by police do not necessarily make a confession involuntary; rather, this is simply one factor to consider out of the totality of the circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The interrogation of a suspect typically requires some deception; a common form of deception is to exaggerate the strength of the evidence against the suspect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.