TPJ v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2022
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Renfro v. State · WJH v. State · Dreiman v. State · Alcaraz v. State · Holmquist v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Pjroceedings under the Juvenile Justice Act are not criminal, but are special proceedings. [In re] BW, 12 P.3d [675] at 677 [ (Wyo.2000) ]. The proceedings are equitable and not punitive to accomplish the purpose of providing "treatment, training and rehabilitation" for children, and to "provide for the care, the protection and the wholesome moral, mental and physical development of children coming within its provisions." Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-6-201 (c)@(C) and (c)(iii) (LexisNexis 2001); see also [In re] WJH, [ 2001 WY 54 , 24 P.3d 1147 ] 119, 10. Accordingly, statutes providing for the care and discipline of juvenile delinquents are generally entitled to a liberal effect and a practical construction in favor of the child's welfare. WJH, ¶¶77, 8. The plain language of the statute, however, still controls our search for the legislative intent when it used the term "restitution for any damage or loss caused by the child's wrongful act." Id. Plainly, the statute limits the amount of restitution to the damages or losses caused by the juvenile's wrongful act.... In Alcaraz [v. State, 2002 WY 57 , 44 P.3d 68 (Wyo.2002)], we determined that restitution should be ordered to compensate for legally recognized losses that directly resulted from the criminal act. Alcaraz, ¶14. To comply with this rule in that case, the district court was required to distinguish between those damages that would compensate the victim for monetary losses and the benefits that would continue to inure to the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(a) For a child at any sanction level, the juvenile court may: [[Image here]] (v) Require the child and his parents or guardian to make restitution for any damage or loss caused by the child's wrongful act,. ... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“provide for the care, the protection and the wholesome moral, mental and physical development of children coming within its provisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.