State v. Trusiani’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2024
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Payton v. New York · Brown v. Illinois · Oliver v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the curtilage of the home is protected from unreasonable entries and searches ... the State is allowed to intrude into the home's curtilage under certain circumstances, including accessing the entry to a dwelling while conducting legitimate law enforcement activities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“should have been excluded because the officers had not obtained a warrant and no exception to the warrant requirement applied. [¶ 10] The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution sets limits on warrantless law enforcement searches of the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“by exploitation of that illegality or instead by means sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary taint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bailey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.