Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 ME 79 - State v. Patterson

State v. Patterson’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Lockhart · Grishman v. Grishman · Bradford v. Dumond · State v. Pelletier · Pierce v. Secretary of United States Department of Health, Education & Welfare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the conflicting statements of the court make it impossible for us to ascertain whether the court found that Patterson failed to provide sufficient evidence to generate the section 105 defense, or whether it concluded that the defense could not be applied as a matter of law, and because a defendant is entitled to a decision of the court based on the record, we must vacate and remand to allow the court to make clear its findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Maine does not recognize common law marriage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.