State v. McIntire’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2021
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · State v. Heath · State v. Hatfield · State v. Ommundson · State v. McLeod
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n addition to any other penalties imposed, if a person has been found guilty of an offense . . . and the sentencing judge finds that a victim, as defined in XX-XX-XXX, has sustained a pecuniary loss, the sentencing judge shall, as part of the sentence, require payment of full restitution to the victim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hollis“there is a direct connection and correlation between the [offense] and the pecuniary loss to the victim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hollis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.