Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 MT 272 - State v. Meyer

State v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · State v. Reesman · State v. Rinehart · State v. Sundberg · State v. Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to determine whether the court's findings of fact are clearly erroneous and whether its interpretation and application of the law are correct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An `affidavit must set forth facts sufficient to show that a law is being violated at the time the warrant is issued. '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.