Nasca v. Hull’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2020
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · Stratemeyer v. Lincoln County · Simmons Oil Corp. v. Holly Corp. · Jane Doe v. American National Red Cross · City of Missoula v. Robertson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The exercise of jurisdiction must be reasonable to comport with due process. In Simmons [Oil Corp.], 244 Mont. at 87-88 , 796 P.2d at 197 , we enumerated several factors to consider when examining the reasonableness of jurisdiction: (1) The extent of the defendant’s purposeful interjection into Montana; (2) The burden on the defendant of defending in Montana; (3) The extent of conflict with the sovereignty of the defendant’s state; (4) Montana’s interest in adjudicating the dispute; (5) The most efficient resolution of the controversy; (6) The importance of Montana to the plaintiffs interest in convenient and effective relief; and (7) The existence of an alternative forum. Further, we noted that “[t]he above factors are not mandatory tests, each of which the plaintiff must pass in order for the court to assume jurisdiction. Rather, the factors simply illustrate the concepts of fundamental fairness, which must be considered in each jurisdictional analysis.” Simmons [Oil Corp.], 244 Mont. at 88 , 796 P.2d at 197 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.