State v. Bearchild’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2025
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1866
Relies on United States v. North · United States v. North · United States v. North · United States v. Paradies · State v. LaMere
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]echnical departures from the jury selection statutes and violations which do not threaten the goals of random selection and objective disqualification do not constitute a substantial failure to comply.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Young · State v. Oschmann“a material failure to substantially comply with [our] statutes governing the procurement of a trial jury,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Young“to technical or immaterial violations of the statutory jury selection scheme”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Oschmann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.