Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 MT 66 - Ellenburg v. Chase

Ellenburg v. Chase’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

98 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Herman v. State (2006), Gyme Kelly v. State (2013)

98 state decisions

480200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Tollett v. Henderson · Schwartz v. Pennsylvania · Feist v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. · Dawson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The petition for postconviction relief must: (a) identify the proceeding in which the petitioner was convicted, give the date of the rendition of the final judgment complained of, and clearly set forth the alleged violation or violations; (c) identify all facts supporting the grounds for relief set forth in the petition and have attached affidavits, records, or other evidence establishing the existence of those facts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(2) When a petitioner has been afforded the opportunity for a direct appeal of the petitioner's conviction, grounds for relief that were or could reasonably have been raised on direct appeal may not be raised, considered, or decided in a proceeding brought under this chapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he Rules of Civil Procedure apply to postconviction petitions only if they are consistent with the specific provisions of the postconviction statutes”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.