¶1Filed 1/14/04 by Clerk of Supreme Court
¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT
¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
¶11State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
¶13v.
¶15Thomas A. Skalicky, Defendant and Appellant
¶19Nos. 20030163-20030167
¶23Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gerald H. Rustad, Judge.
¶25AFFIRMED.
¶27Per Curiam.
¶29Nicole E. Foster (argued), State’s Attorney, and Marlyce A. Wilder (appeared), Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, ND 58802-2047, for plaintiff and appellee.
¶31Kevin J. Chapman, Townsite Bldg., 2nd Fl., P.O. Box 1920, Williston, ND 58802-1920, for defendant and appellant.
¶33Nos. 20030163-20030167
¶35Per Curiam.
¶36[¶1] Thomas Skalicky appeals the order of the district court denying his application for post-conviction relief.He argued his consecutive sentences for robbery under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-01 and burglary under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-02(2)(a) violated the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. Each offense to which Skalicky pleaded guilty “contains an element not contained in the other.” City of Fargo v. Martin Sewall Hector, 534 N.W.2d 821, 823 (N.D. 1995)(citing United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688, 696 (1993), applying Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932)). Double jeopardy does not apply. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).
¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
¶38Carol Ronning Kapsner
¶39Dale V. Sandstrom
¶40William A. Neumann
¶41Mary Muehlen Maring