Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 ND 111 - Fast v. State

Fast v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

2 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2024

2 district · 12 state decisions

80200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miehl v. DARPINO · Anderson v. Meyer Broadcasting Co. · Iglehart v. Iglehart · Green v. Mid Dakota Clinic · Groleau v. Bjornson Oil Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “occupier of premises must act as a reasonable man in maintaining his property in a reasonably safe condition in view of all the circumstances, including the likelihood of injury to another, the seriousness of the injury, and the burden of avoiding the risk.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The resisting party must present competent admissible evidence by affidavit or other comparable means which raises an issue of material fact and must, if appropriate, draw the court's attention to relevant evidence in the record by setting out the page and line in depositions or other comparable documents containing testimony or evidence raising an issue of material fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If a landowner permits dangerous conditions to exist on the premises[,] the landowner must take reasonable measures to prevent injury to those whose presence on the property reasonably can be foreseen.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.