Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Klose v. State (2008), Steen v. State (2007)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson · Lozada v. Warden, State Prison · Ex Parte Graves · State v. Stewart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t would be absurd to have the right to appointed counsel who is not required to be competent,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re KL · State v. T.L.“Because post-conviction relief proceedings are civil in nature and all rules and statutes applicable in civil proceedings are available to the parties, see Vandeberg v. State, 2003 ND 71, ¶5 , 660 N.W.2d 568 , Johnson, under N.D.R.Civ.P. 56(c), should have been afforded 30 days after service of the State’s brief within which to serve and file an answer brief and supporting papers in opposition to the request for summary disposition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kaiser v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.