Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 ND 132 - Moen v. Thomas

Moen v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Iglehart v. Iglehart · Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. McKechnie · Lemer v. Campbell · Barta v. Hinds · Hoerr v. Northfield Foundry and MacH. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The existence of an attorney-client relationship does not depend on an express contract or the payment of fees, and may be implied from. the parties’ conduct. An attorney-client relationship is established when a party seeks and receives advice and assistance from an attorney on matters pertinent to the legal profession. The existence of an attorney-client relationship turns largely on the client’s subjective belief it exists and looks to the nature of the work- performed and to the circqmstances under which confidences are divulged. The existence of an attorney-client relationship is a question of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.