Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 ND 165 - Horner v. Horner

Horner v. Horner’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Ulsaker v. White (2006), Lynnes v. Lynnes (2008)

24 state decisions

130200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fischer v. Fischer · Ruff v. Ruff · Heley v. Heley · Freed v. Freed · Hoverson v. Hoverson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The respective ages of the parties, their earning ability, the duration of the marriage and conduct of the parties during the marriage, their station in life, the circumstances and necessities of each, their health and physical condition, their financial circumstances as shown by the property owned at the time, its value at the time, its income-producing capacity, if any, whether accumulated before or after the marriage, and such other matters as may be material. The trial court is not required to make specific findings, but it must specify a rationale for its determination.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen a court grants a money judgment to achieve an equitable distribution, it should set the term for payment of the cash judgment for as short a period as possible without imposing a serious hardship on the party responsible to pay the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]t is appropriate for a court to consider all of the parties' time together in dividing the marital property when parties live together and then marry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.