Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 ND 210 - Striefel v. Striefel

Striefel v. Striefel’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2021

11 state decisions

80200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 21 Cal. 3d 779 - In Re Marriage of Stenquist · Fox v. Fox · Schmidt v. Schmidt · Amsbaugh v. Amsbaugh · Sommers v. Sommers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the respective ages of the parties, their earning ability, the duration of the marriage and conduct of the parties during the marriage, their station in life, the circumstances and necessities of each, their health and physical condition, their financial circumstances as shown by the property owned at the time, its value at the time, its income-producing capacity, if any, whether accumulated before or after the marriage, and such other matters as may be material. The trial court is not required to make specific findings, but it must specify a rationale for its determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A finding of fact is clearly erroneous under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a) if there is no evidence to support it, if it is clear to the reviewing court that a mistake has been made, or if the finding is induced by an erroneous view of the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re AK

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.