Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 ND 43 - State v. Ochoa

State v. Ochoa’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably State v. Flanagan (2009), Johnson v. State (2004)

25 state decisions

170200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Faretta v. California · Franks v. Delaware · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Oklahoma v. New Mexico

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Courts should indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver[,]'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘Absent a constitutional right to standby counsel, a defendant generally cannot prove standby counsel was ineffective.’ ‘As the word “standby” implies, standby counsel is merely to be available in case the court determines that the defendant is no longer able to represent himself or in case the defendant chooses to consult an attorney.’ As a practical matter, standby counsel does not represent the defendant; the defendant represents himself and may or may not chose to consult with his standby counsel during the course of the proceedings. The duties and responsibilities of standby counsel are understandably less than the obligations of retained or appointed counsel. Thus, standby counsel is not ‘counsel’ within the context of the Sixth Amendment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Generally, the defendant must make a `knowing, intelligent, voluntary, and unequivocal request before a court may conclude he has waived his right to counsel and invoked his right to represent himself.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.