Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 ND 90 - State v. Tweeten

State v. Tweeten’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2026

10 state decisions

60200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ammidown · United States v. Salinas · Healy v. Healy · 228 F. Supp. 483 - United States v. Greater Blouse, Skirt & Neckwear Con. Ass'n · United States v. Goodson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court may dismiss an indictment, information or complaint if unnecessary delay occurs in: (1) presenting a charge to a grand jury; (2) filing an information or complaint against a defendant who has been arrested or for whose arrest a warrant has been issued; or (3) bringing a defendant to trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.