Carnes v. Kemp’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Havel v. Villa St. Joseph (2012), State ex rel. Loyd v. Lovelady (2006)
54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Provident Bank v. Wood · Cater v. City of Cleveland · Johnson's Markets, Inc. v. New Carlisle Department of Health · 85 Ohio App. 3d 179 - Park v. Ambrose · 143 Ohio St. 120 - State Ex Rel. Francis v. Sours
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In interpreting a statute, a court’s principal concern is the legislative intent in enacting the statute. In order to determine that intent, a court must first look at the words of the statute itself. We are also mindful that “ ‘all statutes which relate to the same general subject matter must be read in pari materia.’ ” Cater v. Cleveland (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 24 , 29, 697 N.E.2d 610 , quoting Johnson’s Markets, Inc. v. New Carlisle Dept. of Health (1991), 58 Ohio St.3d 28, 35 , 567 N.E.2d 1018 . In construing such statutes together, full application must be given to both statutes unless they are irreconcilable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a court ha[s] subject-matter jurisdiction to award retroactive child support payments in a paternity action initiated after the child has reached the age SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A 4419. 7 of majority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. HARGROVE v. WARD“a juvenile court has jurisdiction to award retroactive child support payments to an adult emancipated child if a parentage action is filed prior to the child's 23d birthday.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.