Strong v. Laubach’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 521
Relies on State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of Moore · Reynolds v. Special Indemnity Fund · Gaddy v. First National Bank · Meadows v. Meadows · Security Building & Loan Ass'n v. Ward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Claims for compensation or benefits due are completely exempt under 85 O.S.2001 § 48, the exclusive statutory authority for exemptions under the Workers’ Compensation Act, 85 O.S.2001 §§ 1 et seq. The purported exemptions for a “person’s interest in a ... workers’ compensation claim”, under 31 O.S.2001 § 1(A)(21), shall not apply to “claims for compensation or benefits due” under the Oklahoma Workers’ Compensation Act.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Are workers’ compensation proceeds paid to an injured worker entirely exempt from garnishment, as provided in OMa. Stat. tit. 85, § 48, or is the exemption limited to fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), as provided in Okla. Stat. tit. 31, § 1 (A)(21)?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Strong v. Laubach“[c]onflicting legislative acts should be construed in such a way as to reconcile the provisions and render them consistent and harmonious, giving force and effect to each.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.