Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 OK 39 - Fleck v. Fleck

Fleck v. Fleck’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hamid v. Sew Original · Chamberlin v. Chamberlin · Daniel v. Daniel · Booth v. McKnight · Pracht v. Oklahoma State Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “appellant must affirmatively show the alleged error from the record on appeal”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “burden to offer evidence at the hearing which supported [their] position, and, if excluded, to make an offer of proof.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[eJrror may not be predicated upon a ruling which ... excludes evidence unless ... the substance of the evidence was made known to the judge by offer....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.