Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 OK 40 - Cooper v. Booher

Cooper v. Booher’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath · Williams v. Illinois · Humphrey v. Cady · Baxstrom v. Herold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The purpose of the sanction provision in § 2011 is to discourage pleadings, motions or other papers that are frivolous or are filed for an improper purpose such as delay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Since no party sought certiorari with respect to any other portion of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, we leave undisturbed the balance of that opinion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.