Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 OK 81 - Walker v. Ferguson

Walker v. Ferguson’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2022

7 state decisions

40200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · CITY NATL. BANK & TRUST CO. v. Owens · State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma City · FIRST NAT. BANK AND TRUST v. Kissee · Winters Ex Rel. Winters v. City of Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There must be a finding of bad faith or oppressive behavior where the trial court has imposed sanctions on the basis of its inherent or equitable power to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.