Malaske v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2024
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Ohio State Board of Education v. Reed · Simpson v. State · Irvin v. State · Willingham v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be inherently or potentially dangerous to human life, inherently dangerous as determined by the elements of the offense or potentially dangerous in light of the facts and cireumstances surrounding both the felony and the homicide.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Barnett v. State · Quillen v. State“a nexus between the underlying felony and the victim's death,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Barnett v. State · Quillen v. State“substantial factor in bringing about the death and the conduct is dangerous and threatens or destroys life.'' See OUJI-CR 4-60, supra, As in all homicide cases, there must be a causal link between the conduct of the defendant, or of one of the cofelons, and the death, so the jury must be instructed regarding causation. The Commission chose the phrase”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.