Lott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2025 · most notably 2006 OK CR 19 - Hogan v. State (2006), Wilson v. Sirmons (2008)
8 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Williams v. Taylor · Barker v. Wingo · Crawford v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is so unduly prejudicial that it renders the trial fundamentally unfair”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The basic law is well established - when one is put on trial, one is to be convicted - if at all - by evidence which shows one guilty of the offense charged; and proof that one is guilty of other offenses not connected with that for which one is on trial must be excluded.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[the evidence must go to a disputed issue and be necessary to support the State's burden of proof.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Lowery v. State · Eizember v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.