Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 Pa. Super. 192 - Commonwealth v. McClintic

2004 Pa. Super. 192 - Commonwealth v. McClintic’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Ring v. Arizona · Commonwealth v. Edmunds · Commonwealth v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “§ 9714. Sentences for second and subsequent offenses (a) Mandatory sentence.— (1) Any person who is convicted in any court of this Commonwealth of a crime of violence [2] shall, if at the time of the commission of the current offense the person had previously been convicted of a crime of violence, be sentenced to a minimum sentence of at least ten years of total confinement. ... (2) Where the person had at the time of the commission of the current offense previously been convicted of two or more such crimes of violence arising from separate criminal transactions, the person shall be sentenced to a minimum sentence of at least 25 years of total confinement, notwithstanding any other provision of this title or other statute to the contrary. Proof that the offender received notice of or otherwise knew or should have known of the penalties under this paragraph shall not be required. Upon conviction for a third or subsequent crime of violence the court may, if it determines that 25 years of total confinement is insufficient to protect the public safety, sentence the offender to life imprisonment without parole. (a.l) Mandatory maximum. — An offender sentenced to a mandatory minimum sentence under this section shall be sentenced to a maximum sentence equal to twice the mandatory minimum sentence, notwithstanding 18 Pa.C.S. § 1103 (relating to sentence of imprisonment for felony) or any other provision of this title or other statute to the contrary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.