2004 Pa. Super. 212 - Vonada v. Long’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Millili v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing · Commonwealth v. Lord · Gibbs v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole · Commonwealth v. Butler · Wright-Haines v. Proske
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only where “both parties to a contract [are] mistaken as to existing facts at the time of execution.” ... [T]he moving party is required to show the existence of the mutual mistake by evidence that is clear, precise and convincing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“had the immediate effect of changing the status quo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.