2004 Pa. Super. 448 - Blicha v. Jacks’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. Borah · Ferrer v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania · 2003 Pa. Super. 324 - Viener v. Jacobs · 409 Pa. Super. 417 - Estate of Pew · 363 Pa. Super. 97 - S.N.T. Industries, Inc. v. Geanopulos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[WJhen analyzing a decision by a trial court to grant or deny a new trial, the proper standard of review, ultimately, is whether the trial court abused its discretion. Absent a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court, an appellate court must not interfere with the trial court’s authority to grant or deny a new trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“ordered diagnostic testing and made a medical judgment to attempt to contact his patient when he received the results.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“clear, accurate, and more than adequate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.