2004 Pa. Super. 472 - Commonwealth v. Klopp’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. DeWitt · Commonwealth v. Whitmyer · Commonwealth v. Gleason · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeSimone · 2004 Pa. Super. 270 - Commonwealth v. Lindblom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard employed by this Court when considering a Commonwealth appeal from an order granting suppression follows. In reviewing the ruling of a suppression court, our task is to determine whether the factual findings are supported by the record. If so, we are bound by those findings. Where, as here, it is the Commonwealth who is appealing the decision of the suppression court, we must consider only the evidence of the defendant's witnesses and so much of the evidence for the prosecution as read in the context of the record as a whole remains uncontradicted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.