2004 Pa. Super. 482 - Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)
Relies on 2003 Pa. Super. 162 - Isralsky v. Isralsky · 445 Pa. Super. 86 - Twilla v. Twilla · 294 Pa. Super. 129 - Patwardhan v. Brabant · 378 Pa. Super. 89 - Jawork v. Jawork · Wagoner v. Wagoner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘[ajlimony' is a payment of support ... to meet needs of the other former spouse who is unable to support himself or herself through appropriate employment.” Johnson v. Johnson, 864 A.2d 1224, 1229 (Pa.Super.2004).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.