2004 Pa. Super. 63 - Commonwealth v. Raab’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Klinghoffer · Holywell Corp. v. Bank of New York · Commonwealth v. Dennis · Commonwealth v. Claypool · W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. v. Washington Department of Revenue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The following statements, as hereinafter defined, are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness: (6) Records of regularly conducted activity. A memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, or conditions, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, and if it was the regular practice of that business activity to make the memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness, ... unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.