State v. Disanto’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2021
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Scott · County of Los Angeles v. Chavez-Salido · 34 Cal. 3d 441 - People v. Dillon · 38 Cal. 3d 658 - People v. Memro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal presents a question of law, and thus our review is de novo. We must decide anew whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction. In measuring evidentiary sufficiency, we ask “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Berhanu · State v. Klaudt“believe a crime is about to be consummated absent an intervening force”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“clear from a suspect's acts what he intends to do....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.