Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 SD 31 - Boyles v. Weber

Boyles v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Herrera v. Collins · Sprynczynatyk v. General Motors Corp. · State v. Beachum · State v. Engesser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether a defendant has received ineffective assistance of counsel is essentially a mixed question of law and fact. In the absence of a clearly erroneous determination by the circuit court, we must defer to its findings on such primary facts regarding what defense counsel did or did not do in preparation for trial and in his presentation of the defense at trial. This Court, however, may substitute its own judgment for that of the circuit court as to whether defense counsel’s actions or inactions constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]here is a strong presumption that counsel’s performance falls within the wide range of professional assistance and the reasonableness of counsel’s performance is to be evaluated from counsel’s perspective at the time of the alleged error and in light of all the circumstances and the standard of review is highly deferential. The petitioner must overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action might be considered sound trial strategy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is a collateral attack on a final judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.