Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 SD 76 - Flugge v. Flugge

Flugge v. Flugge’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2022

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

100200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 48 Ohio App. 3d 268 - Uebelacker v. Cincom Systems, Inc. · Scotvold v. Scotvold · Luther v. City of Winner · Action Mechanical, Inc. v. Deadwood Historic Preservation Commission · Sommervold v. Grevlos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a civil action or special proceeding is dismissed and if the court determines that it was frivolous or brought for malicious purposes, the court shall order the party whose cause of action or defense was dismissed to pay part or all expenses incurred by the person defending the matter, including reasonable attorneys’ fees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Here, whether demonstrated by physical symptoms or not, the severity of [the plaintiff's] distress could have been proven with expert testimony from a psychiatric expert, or it could simply have been proven by lay witness testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[o]ne in possession of any right, whether conferred by law or by contract, and with full knowledge of the material facts, does or forebears the doing of something inconsistent with the exercise of the right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.