Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 UT 92 - Fisher v. Bybee

Fisher v. Bybee’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Archuleta v. Galetka (2011), Kimball v. Kimball (2009)

30 state decisions

170200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bischel v. Merritt · Tcherepnin v. Franz · Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. Melvin · Lund v. Brown · Otteson v. State, Department of Human Services, Office of Social Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because most are equitable in nature, saturated with facts, and call upon judges to apply fundamental principles of fairness that do not easily lend themselves to appellate review.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... has general application to the activities of counsel and parties .... [the other forms of unintentional conduct that rule 60(b)(1) deems eligible to be considered as grounds to set aside a judgment-ingdvertence, surprise, and excusable neglect-are aptly suited to describe cireumstances which might befall counsel or parties. Those afflicted by these cireumstances are also best suited to explain them to a court in a motion for relief under rule 60(b)(1). Fisher v. Bybee, 2004 UT 92, ¶ 12 , 104 P.3d 1198 (emphasis added); see also Yapp v. Excel Corp., 186 F.3d 1222, 1231 (10th Cir.1999) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We will generally reverse a [lower] court's denial of a rule 60(b) motion only where the court has exceeded its discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.