Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 UT 93 - State v. Willis

State v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Bailey v. United States · In Re Worthen · Grand County v. Emery County · United States v. Purifoy · State v. Casey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When addressing a constitutional challenge to a statute, we presume that the statute is valid and resolve any reasonable doubts in favor of constitutionality.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]e interpret the grant of authoiity to the legislature to regulate the lawful 'use' of arms in article I, section 6 of the Utah Constitution to include the ability to restrict convicted felons from possessing firearms.” (emphasis added)); Hansen v. Am. Online, Inc., 2004 UT 62, ¶ 14 , 96 P.3d 950 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A constitutional challenge to a statute presents a question of law that we review for correctness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.