State v. Krukowski’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2020
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Nix v. Williams · Murray v. United States · State v. Pena · Bailey v. Bayles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Murray, a warrant -based seizure that follows an unlawful entry is not subject to the exclusionary rule if the State establishes that neither the officer's decision to seek the warrant nor the magistrate's probable cause determination was prompted by observations made during the unlawful entry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hoffmann“the affidavit's remaining content is insufficient to establish probable cause, the search warrant must be voided and the fruits of the search excluded to the same extent as if probable cause was lacking on the face of the affidavit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hoffmann“put[ ] the police in the same ... position ... they would have been in if no police error or misconduct had occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hoffmann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.