Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 UT 97 - West v. Holley

West v. Holley’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2025

11 state decisions

80200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood · State v. Menzies · State v. Bishop · State v. Saunders · State v. Calliham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[v]oir dire responses revealing evidence of bias or partiality give rise to a presumption that a potential juror is biased”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A) presumption of bias cannot be rebutted solely by a juror's bare assurance of her own impartiality because a challenged juror cannot reasonably be expected to judge her own fitness to serve.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[clonduct, responses, state of mind or other cireumstances ... reasonably lead the court to conclude the juror is not likely to act impartially.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.