2004 UT App 102 - State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Armstrong v. Dugger · Parsons v. Barnes · State v. Pursifell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is not enough to show that the alleged errors had some conceivable effect on the outcome of the trial but, rather, defendant must show that a reasonable probability exists that, but for counsel's error, the result would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[O]ur inquiry turns on whether a reasonable and impartial decisionmaker would have found the mitigating evidence omitted at sentencing significant and substantial enough to alter the outcome of [Simpson's] sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Simpson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.