Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 UT App 164 - State v. Callahan

2004 UT App 164 - State v. Callahan’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nix v. Williams · United States v. McConney · Bailey v. Bayles · United States v. Radka · State v. Topanotes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[iJn view of the Task Force's adoption of a plan that included an illegal entry from the outset,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an independent, legal avenue for discovery was ever available”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.