Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 UT App 210 - State v. King

2004 UT App 210 - State v. King’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mu'Min v. Virginia · Ristaino v. Ross · Benson v. Empire State Bank · State v. Menzies · State v. Bishop

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Are you people of the opinion that, because of the mere nature of the case, you couldn't listen and be fair?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “would interfere with [their] ability to be fair and impartial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.