2004 UT App 211 - State v. Guzman’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2023
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp. · Modjeski & Masters, Applicant, V · State v. Dunn · State v. Ramirez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a cautionary instruction may be given if the accomplice testimony is uncorroborated and shall be given if the trial judge finds the accomplice testimony self-contradictory, uncertain or improbable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“alerted the jury to [their] possible motives[s] for testifying with less than total candor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was simply not necessary to prompt the jury to question [the] veracity”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.