2004 UT App 241 - Hone v. Hone’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396P (§ 1917 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Jacobson v. Jacobson · 2003 UT App 112 - Harris v. IES Associates, Inc. · Tanner v. Carter · 12 Utah 2d 141 - Park v. Jameson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Blecause a trial court is in an 'advantaged position' to consider equities, we give 'considerable deference to fits] findings and judgment'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] party who seeks an equitable remedy must have acted in good faith and not in violation of equitable principles.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.