2004 UT App 252 - State v. Ison’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2021
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dunn · Henry v. Daytop Village, Inc. · Nunley v. Westates Casing Services, Inc. · State v. Featherson · State v. Bradley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendant’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to admit the decision of the ALJ ... and was also ineffective for failing to object to the trial court’s instruction to the jury that the purchase agreement between defendant and Fiet was “legal and binding.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ison“'counsel's error prejudiced the defendant, i.e., that but for the error, there is a reasonable probability that the [outcome] would have been more favorable to the defendant'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jamieson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.