Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 UTAPP 266 - State v. Todd

State v. Todd’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. Lamoreaux · Serrato v. Utah Transit Authority · State ex rel. A.R. & C.P. v. C.R. · State v. Gerrard · Walker v. U.S. General, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] motion for a new trial shall be made within ten days after imposition of sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'the oral statement from the court regarding [the] defendant's sentence was not reduced to writing, and thus [the] defendant's sentence was not entered until [the date it was reduced to writing and signed].'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I}t is the law of this state ... that a sentence is not entered until it has been reduced to writing and signed by the court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.