Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 UTAPP 267 - State v. Norris

State v. Norris’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Blackledge v. Perry · City of Houston v. Hill · Leila Jeanne Hill Audrey Himmelmann Everitt Simpsons v. Colorado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Any person who has devised any scheme or artifice to defraud another or obtain from another money, property, or anything of value by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises, or material omissions, and who communicates directly or indirectly with any person by any means for the purpose of executing or concealing the scheme or artifice is guilty of: (c) a third degree felony when the value of the property, money, or thing obtained or sought to be obtained is or exceeds $1,000 but is less than $5,000; (e) a second degree felony when the object of the scheme or artifice to defraud is other than the obtaining of something of monetary value[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an unconditional guilty plea does not operate as a waiver of a facial constitutional challenge to a statute, because such a challenge is jurisdictional in nature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The determination of whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law, which we review for correctness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.