2004 UT App 378 - Hatch v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 27 Cal. 3d 916 - Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · 207 Ill. 2d 263 - Feltmeier v. Feltmeier · 25 Cal. 3d 747 - Lackner v. LaCroix · Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc. · Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schettler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the issue is raised in a timely fashion; (2) the issue is specifically raised; and (3) the issue is supported by evidence or relevant legal authority.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"One who takes an active part in the initiation, continuation, or procurement of civil proceedings against another is subject to liability to the other for wrongful civil proceedings if (a) he [or shel acts without probable cause, and primarily for a purpose other than that of securing the proper adjudication of the claim in which the proceedings are based, and (b) except when they are ex parte, the proceedings have terminated in favor of the person against whom they are brought."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“in federal and state court ... in order to ... intimidate the residents of the town as well as the town council to comply with [Plaintiff's] narrow and peculiar political and philosophical positions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.