State v. Quintana’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hamilton · State v. Rimmasch · State v. Larsen · United States v. Crisp · State v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[We conclude that fingerprint identification is not novel scientific evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sheehan · State v. Maestas“and a longstanding reliance on fingerprint evidence, the trial court did not abuse its disceretion when it admitted the fingerprint expert's testimony”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sheehan“); United States v. Collins, 340 F.3d 672, 682 (8th Cir.2003) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Maestas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.