2004 UT App 423 - Case v. Case’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2021
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc. · Housing Authority, County of Salt Lake v. Snyder · LeTellier v. LeTellier · Carlie v. Morgan · Wilcox v. CSX Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether a trial court has subject matter jurisdiction presents a question of law which we review under a correction of error standard, giving no particular deference to the trial court's determination.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“and, in the absence of case law on the subject, examined the official comments section to the UIFSA, on which the Utah statutes were based. Id. In holding that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to modify the California order, in the absence of complying with the statutory requirements, the court held that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the UIFSA drafters intended the exclusions of section 202 to apply in one-state *Page 14 proceedings where the forum state's court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case, and asserts personal jurisdiction over the out-of state party * * *. Accordingly, section 202 only applies to proceedings to establish, enforce, or modify support orders of the forum state against an out-of-state respondent. It is not applicable when the support order was rendered by a state other than the forum state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.