2004 UT App 445 - State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Jacobsen · State v. Decorso · Smith v. Smith · 2000 UT App 238 - State v. Webster · State v. Veteto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“part of Defendant's defense was that he collected the photographs to later provide them to federal law enforcement authorities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. State“intent in possessing the child pornography was a significant question for the jury to determine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.