Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 UT App 462 - Hernandez v. Baker

2004 UT App 462 - Hernandez v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc. · Donald v. Cook County Sheriff's Department · Bair v. Axiom Design, L.L.C. · Hodges v. Gibson Products Co. · Diversified Holdings, L.C. v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant must show: (i) that the judgment was entered against him through exeusable neglect (or any other reason specified in rule 60(b)), (ii) that his motion to set aside the judgment was timely, and (iii) that he has a meritorious defense to the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.